Movie Application Paper - The Kingss Speech Essay

Movie Application Paper - The Kingss Speech - Essay Example The paper "Movie Application Paper - The Kings’s Speech" discovers the film called "The Kings’s Speech". The inspirational film presented the tribulations and challenges faced by King George VI, known as Bertie to the royal family. Bertie has been afflicted with a speech stammer, making it tremendously difficult to make a public announcement or speech to the nation. To make matters worse, the expectations posed by his ascendance to the throne were drastically heightened given the power and responsibilities exemplified by including the need to make public announcements and thereby, conquer his fear for public speaking. In this regard, the movie would be used to identify interpersonal conflict by citing relevant situations and linking these to concepts noted in Floyd’s (2009) book entitled Interpersonal Communication: The Whole Story. Floyd (2009) defined interpersonal conflict as encompassing the following elements or characteristics: manifesting an expressed stru ggle, occurring between two independent parties, presence of incompatible goals, arising from scarce resources, in conjunction with some form of interference. Using the definition, the eminent interpersonal conflict manifested in the movie, The King’s Speech as are follows: First and foremost, the existence of an expressed struggle in terms of capacities for public speaking due to the speech stutters that afflicted the main character, King George. For example, in the introduction, Bertie (then the Duke of York) was asked by his father. to deliver a speech in front of the public and his anxiety and deep struggle to achieve, a seemingly simple goal, drastically failed. Secondly, the interpersonal conflict existed between several parties: Bertie and his father (due to his inability to deliver a speech); Bertie and his brother (when Edward decided to abdicate the throne to marry to a divorcee) and he then had no other option except to assume the throne despite his speech impediment; Bertie and Lionel Logue, the Australian speech therapist, who was contacted by then Duchess of York, to help in overcoming the stutter but was initially perceived by Bertie with apprehension in terms of the ability to address his dilemma; and the cohorts of the monarchy who opposed and questioned Logue’s ability to improve King George’s speech impediment. Third, the presence of incompatible goals was also eminent from the start when the goal of the father was to encourage and train Bertie to overcome his stutter, to his perce ived exasperation and inability. Since he always knew that in the event of his father’s death, his brother Edward would be crowned the next monarch, it was beyond his comprehension when Edward’s goal to marry Wallis Simpson was given precedence. Finally, some form of interference was manifested when King George’s advisors found that Logue was not a licensed speech therapist and should therefore be prevented from continuing his services. There was another situation of interference when apprehension and lack of confidence to Logue and himself, initially prevented then Duke of York to pursue with the speech therapy sessions to be held at Logue’s home. Applicability of Other Interpersonal Conflict Concepts

US v Patel Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

US v Patel - Essay Example One of the main purposes of judicial system is to provide the root cause of social problems. As it appears, the court was much concerned with administering punishment rather than finding out why the defendant was engaging in the medical frauds. There is a possibility for instance that Dr. Patel was not the only one engaging in this unscrupulous activities. Secondly, it has not been included in the case what the defendant wanted to achieve though his actions. It is therefore not possible for the court to prevent such acts from occurring in future. In conclusion, the case study concerned a cardiologist by the name of Dr. Panel who was engaging in unscrupulous and unethical activities. He performed operations on his patients without letting them know what he was actually doing. It is through the intervention of the court that this problem was discovered. While the intervention was important, the court failed in establishing the motivation behind the acts. Punishment alone should not be used to address crimes within the